http://www.larryperson.com/blog/2006/01/30/demolition-of-pier-64 If you get confused, listen to the music play. Tue, 14 Oct 2008 01:40:39 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0 http://www.larryperson.com/blog/2006/01/30/demolition-of-pier-64#comment-66 Tue, 31 Jan 2006 02:49:30 +0000 http://www.larryperson.com/blog/2006/01/30/demolition-of-pier-64#comment-66 [...] Crazy Fingers says Pier 64 is coming down, confirmed by the Hudson River Park plans… One of the three piers in the future “Chelsea Waterside Park” section of Hudson River Park, Pier 64 will be a long green pier providing exceptional views to the north and south. Among the pier’s special design features will be a tree grove oriented to entice park goers to explore the pier’s western end. Pier 64 began its construction process in Fall 2005. The first step involves removing the old piershed structure and demolishing the dock. [...] […] Crazy Fingers says Pier 64 is coming down, confirmed by the Hudson River Park plans… One of the three piers in the future “Chelsea Waterside Park” section of Hudson River Park, Pier 64 will be a long green pier providing exceptional views to the north and south. Among the pier’s special design features will be a tree grove oriented to entice park goers to explore the pier’s western end. Pier 64 began its construction process in Fall 2005. The first step involves removing the old piershed structure and demolishing the dock. […]

]]> http://www.larryperson.com/blog/2006/01/30/demolition-of-pier-64#comment-64 Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:22:39 +0000 http://www.larryperson.com/blog/2006/01/30/demolition-of-pier-64#comment-64 aw. Thanks, Larry. As I explained in the rest of that post, I can understand the vehement opposition to not tearing it down - especially once it got to the point where it was a question of whether the Hudson River Park was going to tear it down, or whether it was just going to slowly take itself down - and I'm sure what goes in in it's place is going to be very nice - but damn, I'm sad to see it go. aw. Thanks, Larry. As I explained in the rest of that post, I can understand the vehement opposition to not tearing it down - especially once it got to the point where it was a question of whether the Hudson River Park was going to tear it down, or whether it was just going to slowly take itself down - and I’m sure what goes in in it’s place is going to be very nice - but damn, I’m sad to see it go.

]]>